Game 9 Points Created Spurs v Clippers 106-113 Loss 5-4 - Bad Start, Great Middle, and Bad Finish
Game 9 Spurs v Clippers 106-113 Loss 5-4 - Bad Start, Great Middle, and Bad Finish
Video Highlights via NBA YouTube:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJDM3AVkV4Y
ESPN Box Scores were used to calculate Points Created Numbers:
https://www.espn.com/nba/boxscore/_/gameId/401468281
Spurs
Sochan .182 4.000
Johnson .338 11.500
Poeltl .385 10.000
Jones .591 19.500
Branham .250 3.500
Bench
Collins .619 13.000
McDermott .348 8.000
Bates-Diop .342 6.500
Richardson -0.114 -2.500
Vassell 1.040 26.000 He was the most impactful Spur player by far. Had the highest Per Minute Efficiency of any player on both teams.
Dieng DNP
Hall DNP
Despite the horrendous start, at 1 point the Clippers were on a 18-2 run, the Spurs battled back behind Vassell and Johnson and got the team into the lead in the middle of the 4th. For a while, things looked good for the Spurs, and then... they simply stopped scoring, and well, they stopped rebounding too. Since I had the Clippers feed, they kept showing the scoring run the Clippers were on. At 1 point, I think I saw 24-7 and thought, well, the Spurs need 3 Holy Mary Touchdowns to win the game. Wrong sport.
Our Starting Post Play was weak today. No excuses! They let Ivica Zubac eat their Puffy Tacos for dinner. and probably got him some Tableside Guacamole as well.
Spurs Team .406 97.500 It's a wonder they kept it close into the 4th quarter.
LA Clippers Team .510 122.500
Clippers
Morris .357 12.500
Zubac .833 30.000 This Points Created Game Score was better than Sochan, Johnson, Jones, and Branham...COMBINED.
Jackson .270 10.000
George .763 29.000 Paul George going PG13 and leading his team to the win.
Kennard .278 2.500
Bench
Batum .225 4.500
Powell .717 16.500
Wall .444 12.000
Mann .333 1.000
Coffey .458 5.500
Brown DNP
Boston DNP
======
Week 2 Points Created Totals will be published this weekend
Rating Scale for PC Effectiveness or Productivity Per Minute
Above .650 - Superstar category. Typically the Top 30 players reach this level of performance
for the entire season.
.550-.649 -All-Stars are in this range, or either just below or above it.
.450-.549 - Good players who are sometimes outstanding fall into this category.
.350-.449 -Regulars. Solid players who are either starters or among a team's first seven or
eight regulars.
.250-.349 -Poor. Players here are mostly rookies or vets whose skills are declining. Could be
solid at position defense. That EFFORT does not show up on a box score.
Below .249 - Awful. Players in this category are living life on the edge. Most are soon traded
or released or sent to the G-League.
Rating Scale for PC per Game Average
Typically, anyone who scores above 10 plays a lot of minutes and contributes meaningful stats for the team.
Frontline players typically provide a PC Game score above 18+.
All-Star players typically provide a PC Game score above 21+.
Superstar players typically provide a PC Game score above 25+.

Comments
Post a Comment